Timing is everything

Bernadette Howell, Spiritual Health Practitioner - December 17, 2024


Breaking silence. Confronting clergy abuse. 


…and sometimes, timing can suck!


A couple of weeks ago I blogged about how, in 2020 we finally received the overdue and long awaited second Vancouver Archdiocese Clergy Abuse Update Report very late in the month of December and all too close to Christmas. 


As one blog reader at that time shared in light of this and in light of waiting for the promised website housing the documents to D.H.’s lawsuit: 

“I bet they’ll string it out to closer to Christmas when they hope most people are preoccupied with the holiday.”


It’s a sentiment that has been shared by many and is a sad indictment of how our Church leaders choose to act and it's also very sad because this is how its members and the public feel. 


But thus it is dear readers, for so it has come to pass.


With everyone now exceedingly busy in the lead up to Christmas and many of us on the move, travelling to be with family or celebrate Christmas elsewhere, the long-awaited website, designed to house the documents that were part of D.H.’s May 28, 2024 settlement terms has finally been shared. 

I now share links to this website further down in this blog…


I say it has finally been shared but how does anyone really know that this website now exists? 


How would anyone know where to look?


There is no public notice about this nor anything that I can see listed on the Vancouver Archdiocese website to say that this website is now available. 

Nothing has been announced in public press or media.


But I am an interested member of the public! 


So how on earth is one supposed to find such news?


Sadly, the Catholic Church never uses secular media to share news that impacts so many Catholics, whether practicing or non-practicing. 

Let it be said that not every practicing Catholic reads the ‘B.C. Catholic’ whether online or in print. And so, I have to assume that Catholic Church leadership both at Westminster Abbey/Christ the King Seminary and at the Vancouver Archdiocese doesn't think it necessary to more publicly share this initiative, which incidentally, only came about because D.H. insisted upon it.


Does the Church not realize that the vast majority of victims hurt by their priests don’t go to church anymore? Consequently, they don’t have access to or read parish newsletters or bulletins. Nor do they read the conservative publication called the ‘B.C. Catholic’?


Those impacted by Placidus Sander and others at Christ the King Minor Seminary no longer have connections to their much-loved faith of their youth. Too hurt by what they experienced, this does not mean however that they should be excluded from knowing about this ‘transparency initiative”... 


With limited time available to me this week, allow me at least to share with readers across the country, far and wide, that on Saturday 14 December 2024, the bi-annual copy of ‘Pax Regis’, the Christ the King Seminary newsletter came out. I attach a link to a copy here.


https://sck.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/E-PaxRegisFall2024sm.pdf


This newsletter, December 2024, Volume 84, refers to the new website which D.H. insisted upon as part of his settlement terms. If it weren’t for D.H., no such efforts towards transparency would ever exist.


The community of monks speak about a “journey toward healing and reconciliation following the sexual abuse perpetrated by Placidus Sander at the minor seminary” and they refer to “the profound harm caused by these acts of abuse in the 1970s, and the subsequent pain experienced by victim/survivors…” 


Good to know this is finally being acknowledged and addressed. But it is somewhat incorrect with its facts.


One blog reader and ex-seminarian has already reached out to me so say that:


“Placidus was in fact, perpetrating sodomy and sexual abuse on little boys in the 1960’s or before.” 


This ex-seminarian goes on to say: “I was there in the 1960s and knew two of those lads” adding that tragically, one of those young boys abused in the 1960s by Placidus committed suicide and another, very understandably so, has suffered very poor mental health through his lifetime." 


These abuses in the 1960s happened long before the abuses experienced by D.H., Mark O’Neill and the third victim, all three of whom so courageously took part in the 1995 criminal trial. 


You will notice on Page 4 of the December 2024 ‘Pax Regis’ there is a “Scan Me” code, which, in my opinion, is easy enough to miss. 


You have to use your cell phone so as to be able to access the website. 


Once you take an image of the "Scan Me" code on your cell phone camera, this allows you to view the website on your tiny mobile screen such as I found myself doing. I subsequently then had to copy and paste the website link, from my cell phone, into a new email and then send it to myself so as to be able to open it on a regular computer or laptop!


Really?


Why not provide an easy ‘click here’ link so that that readers can browse the website at leisure on one’s home computer or laptop? There are many documents to review after all.


For your ease, I attach a link to the website here, titled the Minor Seminary Transparency Initiative

https://catholicseminaryabusedocuments.com/.


As I am currently travelling and, on the move, I’ve not been able to read any of the documents. I set off on my travels on Saturday 14th December, am now on vacation on top of this, wifi is spotty and very sporadic. But most of all, it's family time and I want to spend this with the people I love.


My promise to you is this: in January, when back home, I will give much more detailed commentary and feedback through my blog.


For now, however, here are some general comments that I can give. 


Firstly, there are many documents to trawl through on the website and bear in mind, this is not a complete list of all documents. We are told that as additional information is available, it will be updated. 


My question is this: will there be a visible notice on the website to indicate new information has been added (and where..) since last logging into the site?

With so many documents currently on the site, it is naturally hard for folk, not working close to victim-survivors or involved in the legal process to read through the various pages and wonder what you are looking at. 


Bear with me on this. In January I plan to direct you to some key pointers that will help you to make better sense of things and help you to understand just exactly what was known for decades about Placidus by his community of monks and by local bishops and Church leaders. 


Secondly, neither the Pax Regis nor the Minor Seminary Transparency Initiative refer in any way to the promised retraction notice of the two-page tribute written up about Placidus and published in Pax Regis in December 2021. This is the two-page tribute and obituary where the ONLY reference to Placidus’ most heinous sexual abuse crimes on children was:


“…not everyone had a positive experience of him” 


Essentially, the acts of rape and sodomy of children was written off by the monks of Westminster Abbey / Christ the King Seminary as simply being not such a “positive experience.”


I have already since received comments from blog readers, rightly so, infuriated that no retraction notice or mention is made of the horrendous obituary:

“Should any of the monks be allowed to have access to children if they believe sodomizing children is merely “not a positive experience.”?


…and, 


“Have those who wrote it (the original obituary) and those who approved it for publication in Pax Regis been sanctioned or otherwise held accountable?”


As blog readers, you should know that back in August when email correspondence was still going back and forth and we continued to plead for a public retraction notice of Placidus very hurtful obituary, we even supplied very generous draft wording to the Prior up at Westminster Abbey to help expedite the process. 


What process you may well ask, as it seems perhaps there was never any real intention of issuing a retraction notice.


The Prior, Benedict LeFebvre had already shared on email during the summer (and with the Vancouver Archdiocese on copy) that he agreed that the obituary was “inadequate and deeply hurtful to survivors” and had added that “we all know now that it cannot stand.” 


Yet still nothing.


And the tribute still stands. 


What about the promises to offer a retraction notice and do a rewrite? 


All this painful waiting for nothing?


With not one single mention about the retraction of the obituary, nor any attempt to rectify and offer a more healing approach, instead we read 'glowing words' in what the monks are calling “A Tribute to Victim/Survivors.” 


This “Tribute to Victim/Survivors” can be found in both ‘Pax Regis’ and on the website and is signed off by the Abbot, Alban Riley, the monks of Westminster Abbey, and the community of the Seminary of Christ the King. 


We find the following words being shared: 


“Each word you have shared carries the weight of profound courage – courage that has shaken our community to its core and demanded that we listen, truly listen. You have taught us fundamental truths: that victims must be our first concern…”


If perchance the Abbot, Alban Riley, the monks of Westminster Abbey, and the community of the Seminary of Christ the King monks are reading this blog and if you say victims are your first concern, why then are you NOT listening? 


You have been asked several times by ex-seminarians and victim-survivors to please retract the very hurtful obituary, yet you have not done so. 

Instead, you choose to use glowing words which fall very short of concrete action to say “we stand ready to listen when and if you choose to speak.”


But we have chosen to speak.


And we have already spoken! 


Not only this, but we have also repeated ourselves on many an occasion. 


Before drawing this week’s blog to a close, allow me share other comments received from blog readers thus far (and please know I am open to receiving all of your comments at BernadetteHowell@shaw.ca):


One reader writes:


“The new Minor Seminary Transparency Initiative website is full of weasel words and worn-out risk management tropes. A few examples such as they (the monks) will:


“strive to ensure”


“continue to strengthen"


“stand ready to listen”


“embrace our sacred duty”


“draw inspiration from the angels”



“foster a community where survivors are believed and supported”.


Thank you to the blog reader for sharing these observations.


Here is another comment which I feel I must include because it made me smile.


Another blog reader queried the logo noting: 


“God help us. The Transparency Initiative has its own logo. Looks a bit like a toilet lid.” 


You gotta smile!


Personally, I think the logo seems nice enough, but I suspect it took forever to design and that such material matters took precedence over the real essentials. 


A simple obituary retraction notice would have meant a hell of a lot more to survivors than a fancy logo… 


I leave you this week for now, as I head off to enjoy Christmas on the ocean...


If wifi works when out at sea (and that's a big IF...) you may receive a short Christmas and New Year's blog but whether that works or not, I promise to share more about the ‘transparency initiative’ when back in early to mid-January.


Till then, thank you, as ever, for reading….


Bernadette 

Read More
By Outrage Canada April 2, 2025
CBC Lite - April 1, 2025 St. John's, NL - A Newfoundland court has increased the total liability of the Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of St. John’s to $121 million after a successful appeal by 59 victims of sexual abuse. These victims, previously excluded from compensation, were awarded $15.3 million in addition to the $104-million settlement approved in 2024 for nearly 300 victims. The case involves abuse by the Christian Brothers at Mount Cashel orphanage and other Catholic institutions in Newfoundland and British Columbia. Despite selling over 100 properties, the corporation has only raised $40 million—far short of the required funds. A previous $22 million was distributed to victims, but insurance coverage was denied. The provincial government may also face legal pressure to contribute to compensation. Justice Garrett Handrigan ruled that the corporation remains liable, reversing decisions that denied compensation to some victims. This includes 12 claimants in British Columbia, where church officials knowingly transferred abusive clergy from Newfoundland. However, past settlements will be deducted from new awards. The court will finalize this latest settlement after May 1.
By Outrage Canada April 2, 2025
Bernadette Howell, Spiritual Health Practitioner - April 2, 2025 Breaking the silence. Confronting clergy abuse. The month of March has come and gone, with its mix of sun, wind, rain, and clocks that needed changing! Some of us may have been surprised waking up this morning to realize that it is already April. How fast time flies when you’re having fun…or perhaps, are exceedingly busy! For my part, I’ve been exceedingly busy, but here I am once more, with yet another blog. It is one I will attempt to keep short but know, dear readers, that this week’s blog is one I would prefer not to be writing at all. Why? Because the end of March was the promised date for the wildly late, overly long-awaited Vancouver Archdiocese Clergy Abuse Update Report. But, as you have guessed, it's not coming. We're not getting anything! It's been nearly three full years of absolute silence. No communications or updates of any kind, despite the Archbishop's commitment to publish a Clergy Abuse Update Report every six months. I quote first from Archbishop Miller’s speech at the Vancouver Archdiocese Annual Dinner on 30 October 2018: “This evening, I would like to begin my conversation with you by calling attention to the grave situation of clerical sexual abuse and cover-up by bishops, which has recently come to light. My first responsibility is toward the victims of these horrific crimes, those who have been so severely harmed by members of the clergy. It has been an extraordinarily trying time for victims and their families, who have been forced yet again to revisit the injustices they have suffered.” As reported by the B.C. Catholic, Archbishop Miller then went on to say: “We must find more effective ways to support and care for victims of abuse, to protect everyone from it ever happening again, and to bring justice and closure to historical cases of abuse.” Then from his Pastoral Letter, four months later on 19 February 2019: “The Archdiocese is committed to supporting victims of clergy sexual abuse meaningfully through the provision of counselling and effective advocacy support as they journey on the path to healing. Too often in the past, victims have been allowed to fade away from our Church family without receiving the justice and support that they deserve... It is imperative to find ways to reach out to victims and their families with our most sincere apologies and an invitation to receive whatever comfort and healing we can facilitate”. He goes on to say: “We will also be taking bold steps to ensure that abusive clergy members are held accountable for the terrible crimes they have committed. Greater transparency will invite more input for change and will foster greater trust in the faithful members of our clergy and religious communities.” And then there is Archbishop Miller’s Pastoral Letter from 25 November 2019, his letter which accompanied the Vancouver Archdiocese Clergy Abuse Report and its thirty-one recommendations: “Now is the time for us to address more fully what we, as the local Church, can do to respond better to the needs of victims of abuse, as well as improve our policies and procedures that have been in place for many years. All these efforts going forward entail a profound and continuous conversion of our hearts. Such a conversion must be accompanied by a firm commitment to take concrete and effective action marked by greater transparency and accountability in all that we do.” I can quote so much more, but I’ll stop right here. “All these efforts going forward entail a profound and continuous conversion of our hearts. Such a conversion must be accompanied by a firm commitment to take concrete and effective action marked by greater transparency and accountability in all that we do.” It gives me no joy to say that: I have seen no such “conversion of heart”. Not in all the years I have tried hard to help the Archdiocese of Vancouver address this topic and care for its victims. I have seen no “firm commitments” honoured nor have I witnessed or experienced “concrete and effective action”. And I have seen no “transparency” or “accountability” take place. Have you? Please do let me know so that I might share it with others. So allow me instead to share what we do get in place of concrete action, conversion of heart and firm commitments… We, as in myself and a couple of others (who were also members of the Clergy Abuse Review Committee) get an email from the Archbishop’s Delegate for Operations, James Borkowski, telling us that: “After receiving feedback from insurers and other stakeholders, the new website is being paused.” As an invested stakeholder myself, along with many other Catholics and non-Catholics alike, whether victim-survivors or not, what can one possibly say to this? There is quite simply no suitable or adequate response to be made! Here's a thing. None of us is looking for a fancy website! We never asked for a website. Just a report - twice a year. We just want to be updated on the progress of all the recommendations and the commitments made by the Archbishop and the Vancouver Archdiocese. We just want to be updated with news of other predator priests still not named but known to the Archdiocese. We want to hear and know that the plight of victims matters. And that when names are released of predator priests known to the Archdiocese but kept hidden till now, many victims who have suffered alone will know they are not alone. We don't want lofty language and empty promises on fancy new websites, all of which amount to nothing when action does not follow. And as for silence? Perhaps no one at the Vancouver Archdiocese has yet realized the impact that silence has on victim-survivors? Silence was, and still is, the very weapon which predator priests use over their victims. Thus, silence today, from leaders who should know better, is incredibly harmful and damaging. Another recipient of that email from last week, notifying us that the Catholic Church’s insurance companies and “other stakeholders” are not happy with the website wrote: “We are not the only people who are concerned about this matter. The community at large needs to be informed as to what will and will not happen, and why.” They then added, “the Archdiocese should publish a statement about what it does intend to do, and how it expects to move forward on commitments made,” suggesting that this should be done "as soon as possible". Yet another wrote, “I am losing hope that anything will change in this diocese” adding that whatever improvements and undertakings have taken place, leave one with the feeling that these are just “temporary band aids to create an illusion to convince the public that things will change.” Needless to say, since receiving the email, and all recipients responding, there has only been more silence. No further communication. No reaction. No offer to publish a statement about what the Archdiocese intends to do. Whatever happened to Archbishop Miller’s and the Vancouver Archdiocese’s first responsibility being “toward the victims of these horrific crimes, those who have been so severely harmed by members of the clergy” and “respond(ing) better to the needs of victims of abuse”? Has nobody in the Vancouver Archdiocese, leaders or administration, made the connection yet that the victims “so severely harmed” are the very ones waiting and wondering why there are no updates being shared, whether about predator priests, cases in progress, or class action suits underway? And what about Archbishop Miller’s imperative “to find ways to reach out to victims and their families” and the “invitation to receive whatever comfort and healing” the Archdiocese can facilitate? Allow me to bring this blog to a close by sharing words received from a blog reader this past week. They wrote: “Your blog is unprecedented in scope, detail and history, and stands alone as a reference work”. Albeit this is weighty stuff for me to hear, I am glad that my truth-telling stands alone as a reference work, for too much is hidden by Catholic Church leadership and kept in the dark. Too much that is still covered-up. I find myself carrying a torch that I would rather not carry... Whoever the original quote may be attributed to, I echo their words that “the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.” I, for one, cannot stand by. Please do not become one of the many who do nothing, but join me instead, in speaking out and speaking the truth... Until the next time, Bernadette
More Posts
Share by: