Bernadette Howell, Spiritual Health Practitioner - December 17, 2024
Breaking silence. Confronting clergy abuse.
…and sometimes, timing can suck!
A couple of weeks ago I blogged about how, in 2020 we finally received the overdue and long awaited second Vancouver Archdiocese Clergy Abuse Update Report very late in the month of December and all too close to Christmas.
As one blog reader at that time shared in light of this and in light of waiting for the promised website housing the documents to D.H.’s lawsuit:
“I bet they’ll string it out to closer to Christmas when they hope most people are preoccupied with the holiday.”
It’s a sentiment that has been shared by many and is a sad indictment of how our Church leaders choose to act and it's also very sad because this is how its members and the public feel.
But thus it is dear readers, for so it has come to pass.
With everyone now exceedingly busy in the lead up to Christmas and many of us on the move, travelling to be with family or celebrate Christmas elsewhere, the long-awaited website, designed to house the documents that were part of D.H.’s May 28, 2024 settlement terms has finally been shared.
I now share links to this website further down in this blog…
I say it has finally been shared but how does anyone really know that this website now exists?
How would anyone know where to look?
There is no public notice about this nor anything that I can see listed on the Vancouver Archdiocese website to say that this website is now available.
Nothing has been announced in public press or media.
But I am an interested member of the public!
So how on earth is one supposed to find such news?
Sadly, the Catholic Church never uses secular media to share news that impacts so many Catholics, whether practicing or non-practicing.
Let it be said that not every practicing Catholic reads the ‘B.C. Catholic’ whether online or in print. And so, I have to assume that Catholic Church leadership both at Westminster Abbey/Christ the King Seminary and at the Vancouver Archdiocese doesn't think it necessary to more publicly share this initiative, which incidentally, only came about because D.H. insisted upon it.
Does the Church not realize that the vast majority of victims hurt by their priests don’t go to church anymore? Consequently, they don’t have access to or read parish newsletters or bulletins. Nor do they read the conservative publication called the ‘B.C. Catholic’?
Those impacted by Placidus Sander and others at Christ the King Minor Seminary no longer have connections to their much-loved faith of their youth. Too hurt by what they experienced, this does not mean however that they should be excluded from knowing about this ‘transparency initiative”...
With limited time available to me this week, allow me at least to share with readers across the country, far and wide, that on Saturday 14 December 2024, the bi-annual copy of ‘Pax Regis’, the Christ the King Seminary newsletter came out. I attach a link to a copy here.
https://sck.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/E-PaxRegisFall2024sm.pdf
This newsletter, December 2024, Volume 84, refers to the new website which D.H. insisted upon as part of his settlement terms. If it weren’t for D.H., no such efforts towards transparency would ever exist.
The community of monks speak about a “journey toward healing and reconciliation following the sexual abuse perpetrated by Placidus Sander at the minor seminary” and they refer to “the profound harm caused by these acts of abuse in the 1970s, and the subsequent pain experienced by victim/survivors…”
Good to know this is finally being acknowledged and addressed. But it is somewhat incorrect with its facts.
One blog reader and ex-seminarian has already reached out to me so say that:
“Placidus was in fact, perpetrating sodomy and sexual abuse on little boys in the 1960’s or before.”
This ex-seminarian goes on to say: “I was there in the 1960s and knew two of those lads” adding that tragically, one of those young boys abused in the 1960s by Placidus committed suicide and another, very understandably so, has suffered very poor mental health through his lifetime."
These abuses in the 1960s happened long before the abuses experienced by D.H., Mark O’Neill and the third victim, all three of whom so courageously took part in the 1995 criminal trial.
You will notice on Page 4 of the December 2024 ‘Pax Regis’ there is a “Scan Me” code, which, in my opinion, is easy enough to miss.
You have to use your cell phone so as to be able to access the website.
Once you take an image of the "Scan Me" code on your cell phone camera, this allows you to view the website on your tiny mobile screen such as I found myself doing. I subsequently then had to copy and paste the website link, from my cell phone, into a new email and then send it to myself so as to be able to open it on a regular computer or laptop!
Really?
Why not provide an easy ‘click here’ link so that that readers can browse the website at leisure on one’s home computer or laptop? There are many documents to review after all.
For your ease, I attach a link to the website here, titled the Minor Seminary Transparency Initiative:
https://catholicseminaryabusedocuments.com/.
As I am currently travelling and, on the move, I’ve not been able to read any of the documents. I set off on my travels on Saturday 14th December, am now on vacation on top of this, wifi is spotty and very sporadic. But most of all, it's family time and I want to spend this with the people I love.
My promise to you is this: in January, when back home, I will give much more detailed commentary and feedback through my blog.
For now, however, here are some general comments that I can give.
Firstly, there are many documents to trawl through on the website and bear in mind, this is not a complete list of all documents. We are told that as additional information is available, it will be updated.
My question is this: will there be a visible notice on the website to indicate new information has been added (and where..) since last logging into the site?
With so many documents currently on the site, it is naturally hard for folk, not working close to victim-survivors or involved in the legal process to read through the various pages and wonder what you are looking at.
Bear with me on this. In January I plan to direct you to some key pointers that will help you to make better sense of things and help you to understand just exactly what was known for decades about Placidus by his community of monks and by local bishops and Church leaders.
Secondly, neither the Pax Regis nor the Minor Seminary Transparency Initiative refer in any way to the promised retraction notice of the two-page tribute written up about Placidus and published in Pax Regis in December 2021. This is the two-page tribute and obituary where the ONLY reference to Placidus’ most heinous sexual abuse crimes on children was:
“…not everyone had a positive experience of him”
Essentially, the acts of rape and sodomy of children was written off by the monks of Westminster Abbey / Christ the King Seminary as simply being not such a “positive experience.”
I have already since received comments from blog readers, rightly so, infuriated that no retraction notice or mention is made of the horrendous obituary:
“Should any of the monks be allowed to have access to children if they believe sodomizing children is merely “not a positive experience.”?
…and,
“Have those who wrote it (the original obituary) and those who approved it for publication in Pax Regis been sanctioned or otherwise held accountable?”
As blog readers, you should know that back in August when email correspondence was still going back and forth and we continued to plead for a public retraction notice of Placidus very hurtful obituary, we even supplied very generous draft wording to the Prior up at Westminster Abbey to help expedite the process.
What process you may well ask, as it seems perhaps there was never any real intention of issuing a retraction notice.
The Prior, Benedict LeFebvre had already shared on email during the summer (and with the Vancouver Archdiocese on copy) that he agreed that the obituary was “inadequate and deeply hurtful to survivors” and had added that “we all know now that it cannot stand.”
Yet still nothing.
And the tribute still stands.
What about the promises to offer a retraction notice and do a rewrite?
All this painful waiting for nothing?
With not one single mention about the retraction of the obituary, nor any attempt to rectify and offer a more healing approach, instead we read 'glowing words' in what the monks are calling “A Tribute to Victim/Survivors.”
This “Tribute to Victim/Survivors” can be found in both ‘Pax Regis’ and on the website and is signed off by the Abbot, Alban Riley, the monks of Westminster Abbey, and the community of the Seminary of Christ the King.
We find the following words being shared:
“Each word you have shared carries the weight of profound courage – courage that has shaken our community to its core and demanded that we listen, truly listen. You have taught us fundamental truths: that victims must be our first concern…”
If perchance the Abbot, Alban Riley, the monks of Westminster Abbey, and the community of the Seminary of Christ the King monks are reading this blog and if you say victims are your first concern, why then are you NOT listening?
You have been asked several times by ex-seminarians and victim-survivors to please retract the very hurtful obituary, yet you have not done so.
Instead, you choose to use glowing words which fall very short of concrete action to say “we stand ready to listen when and if you choose to speak.”
But we have chosen to speak.
And we have already spoken!
Not only this, but we have also repeated ourselves on many an occasion.
Before drawing this week’s blog to a close, allow me share other comments received from blog readers thus far (and please know I am open to receiving all of your comments at BernadetteHowell@shaw.ca):
One reader writes:
“The new Minor Seminary Transparency Initiative website is full of weasel words and worn-out risk management tropes. A few examples such as they (the monks) will:
“strive to ensure”
“continue to strengthen"
“stand ready to listen”
“embrace our sacred duty”
“draw inspiration from the angels”
“foster a community where survivors are believed and supported”.
Thank you to the blog reader for sharing these observations.
Here is another comment which I feel I must include because it made me smile.
Another blog reader queried the logo noting:
“God help us. The Transparency Initiative has its own logo. Looks a bit like a toilet lid.”
You gotta smile!
Personally, I think the logo seems nice enough, but I suspect it took forever to design and that such material matters took precedence over the real essentials.
A simple obituary retraction notice would have meant a hell of a lot more to survivors than a fancy logo…
I leave you this week for now, as I head off to enjoy Christmas on the ocean...
If wifi works when out at sea (and that's a big IF...) you may receive a short Christmas and New Year's blog but whether that works or not, I promise to share more about the ‘transparency initiative’ when back in early to mid-January.
Till then, thank you, as ever, for reading….
Bernadette
All Rights Reserved | Outrage Canada | Privacy Policy
Website by EVOLV Digital Marketing